Thumbnail Managing Standard

History

• December 2020, Version 0.9.0

  • Added x-large and xx-large thumbnail sizes

• May 2012, Version 0.8.0

  • Modified to respect the XDG Base Directory Specification

• September 2004, Version 0.7.0

  • Added readonly support for shared thumbnail repositories

• September 2002, Version 0.6.1

  • The subdirectories weren't a good idea. Removed them from this version.

  • Updated link to the MD5 implementation.

• September 2002, Version 0.6

  • Added another sub directory level within the cache base directories to avoid too much clutter.

  • State not to create thumbnails for files within the thumbnail cache directory.

  • State when it's allowed to use thumbnails which haven't been checked for validity.

  • Some typo fixes.

  • Introduction and conclusion rewrite.

• January 2002, Version 0.5

  • Changed handling of different thumbnail sizes.

  • Renamed directories.

  • Propose using temporary filenames to avoid problems with concurrent access.

  • Save thumbnails directly in the size dir without subdirs.

  • Added optional Thumb::Mimetype key

  • Give some more implementation notes.

  • Added "Thanks" section.

• December 2001, Version 0.4

  • Destinction between required and optional thumbnail attributes.

  • Dropped distinction between global/local .thumbnail directories.

  • Use MD5 hashes as thumbnail filename.

  • Initial attempt to handle concurrent accesses by different programs.

  • Rewrote the "Deleting Thumbnails" section.

• August 2001, Version 0.3

  • Rewrote this paper.

• July 2001, Version 0.2

  • Removed distinction between low/high quality thumbnails.

  • Separate directory for failures.

  • Consider permission settings.

• July 2001, Version 0.1

  • First public release.

Introduction

This paper deals with the permanent storage of previews for file content. In particular, it tries to define a general and widely accepted standard for this task. That way, it will be possible to share these so called thumbnails across a large number of applications.

The current situation is, that nearly every program introdues a new way of dealing with thumbnails. This results in the fact, that if the user uses 4 or 5 different programs, they will end up with 4 or 5 thumbnails for the same file. It's obvious that this is not only a waste of the user's disk space, but also makes the managing of large collections harder.

But why does a program use thumbnails? Often these are presented in file operation dialogs to give the user a hint what a certain file is about. This can be seen as information in addition to the plain filename which helps to identify the desired file faster and more easily. But the idea isn't limited to images and file operation dialogs. The additional value of previews is also applicable to other file types, like text documents, pdf files, spreadsheets and so on. The reason why this isn't deployed widely so far is, that it requires a lot of effort and is only of little use for a single program (for example, if only the spreadsheet program can create and view it's previews). But imagine if your filemanager could display all these previews too, while you are browsing through your filesystem.

If there is a general accepted, file type independent way how to deal with previews, the above sketched vision can come true. Every time an application saves a file it creates also a preview thumbnail for it. Other programs can check if there is a thumbnail for a specific file and can present it. This proposal tries to unify the thumbnail managing and constitutes the first step to a better graphical desktop.

Issues To Solve

There are some issues to solve to make this work correctly. Specifically these are:

• Find a place for permanent storing.

• Preserve information about original image and make them easily accessible without touching the original.

• Provide the ability to handle different thumbnail sizes.

• Take care of thumbnail generation failures.

• Find a way to access thumbnails concurrently with different programs.

Thumbnail Directory

For every user, there must be exactly one place where all generated thumbnails are stored. This thumbnails directory is located in the user's XDG Cache Home, as defined by the XDG Base Directory Specification. Namely, if the environment variable $XDG_CACHE_HOME is set and not blank then the directory $XDG_CACHE_HOME/thumbnails will be used, otherwise $HOME/.cache/thumbnails will be used.

---

Directory Structure

The thumbnails directory will have the following internal structure:

$XDG_CACHE_HOME/thumbnails/ $XDG_CACHE_HOME/thumbnails/normal $XDG_CACHE_HOME/thumbnails/large/ $XDG_CACHE_HOME/thumbnails/x-large/ $XDG_CACHE_HOME/thumbnails/xx-large/ $XDG_CACHE_HOME/thumbnails/fail/

The meaning of the directories are as follows:

• Normal: The default place for storing thumbnails. The image size must not exceed 128x128 pixel. Programs which need smaller resolutions should read and write the 128x128 thumbnails and downscale them afterwards to the desired dimension. See Thumbnail Creation for more details.

• Large: The previous notes apply to this directory too, except that the thumbnail size must be 256x256 pixel.

• Extra Large: The previous notes apply to this directory too, except that the thumbnail size must be 512x512 pixel.

• Extra extra Large: The previous notes apply to this directory too, except that the thumbnail size must be 1024x1024 pixel.

• Fail: This directory is used to store information about files where a thumbnail couldn't be generated. See Thumbnail Generation Failure for more details.

You must not create/save thumbnails for any files you will find in these directories. Instead load and use these files directly.

Thumbnail Creation

---

Thumbnail Size

As already mentionend in the Thumbnail Directory section there exists four suggested sizes you can use for your thumbnails: 128x128, 256x256, 512x512, 1024x1024 pixel. The idea is that if a program uses another size for it's previews it loads one of the two versions and scales them down to the desired size. Similar, when creating a thumbnail it scales the file down to 128x128 first (or 256x256, 512x512, or 1024x1024), saves it to disk and then reduce the size further. This mechanism enables all programs to obtain their desired previews in an easy and fast way.

However, these are suggestions. Implementations should cope also with images that are smaller than the suggested size for the normal, large and extra large subdirectories. Depending on the difference between the actual and the desired size, they can either use the smaller one found in the cache and scale it down or recreate a thumbnail with the proposed size for this directory.

If a program needs a thumbnail for an image file which is smaller than 128x128 pixel it doesn't need to save it at all.

All sizes define just a rectangle area where the thumbnail must fit in. Don't scale every image to a rectangular thumbnail but preserve the ratio instead!

Thumbnail Saving

The thumbnail filename is determined by a hashfunction. This proposal utilizes MD5 as hash mechanism in the following way.

1. You need the absolute canonical URI for the original file, as stated in URI RFC 2396. In particular this defines to use three '/' for local 'file:' resources (see example below).

2. Calculate the MD5 hash for this URI. Not for the file it points to! This results in a 128bit hash, which is representable by a hexadecimal number in a 32 character long string.

3. To get the final filename for the thumbnail just append a '.png' to the hash string. According to the dimension of the thumbnail you must store the result either in $XDG_CACHE_HOME/thumbnails/normal, $XDG_CACHE_HOME/thumbnails/large, $XDG_CACHE_HOME/thumbnails/x-large, or $XDG_CACHE_HOME/thumbnails/xx-large.

An example will illustrate this:

/home/jens/.cache/thumbnails/normal/c6ee772d9e49320e97ec29a7eb5b1697.png

---

Concurrent Thumbnail Creation

An important goal of this paper is to enable programs to share their thumbnails. This includes the occurrences of concurrent accesses to the cache by different programs. Problems arise if two programs try to create a thumbnail for the same file at the same time. Because of this the following procedure is suggested:

1. Check if the thumbnail already exists and if it's valid.

2. If the above conditions are not fulfilled create the thumbnail and write it under a temporary filename onto the disk.

3. Rename the temporary file to the thumbnail filename. Since this is an atomic operation the new thumbnail is either completely written or not.

This way the worst case is that a thumbnail will be written twice. However, the thumbnail is in a sane state at any time.

The temporary file should be placed into the same directory as the final thumbnail, because then you are sure that they lay on the same filesystem. This guarantees a fast renaming of the temporary file. Using a combination of programname, process id and eg. first characters from the hash string should give a fairly unique temporary name.

---

Advantages Of This Approach

Previously versions of this standard used a very different mechanism for storing thumbnails. But this one has some very important advantages:

1. Works for all kinds of possible file locations, since its based only on the textual URI representation of a file. This way files that are located on the locale filesystem or a samba, http, ftp or WebDAV server can be treated equally.

2. It results in a flat directory hierarchy which assures fast access. Since the hash is always 32 characters long the thumbnail filename is exactly 36 characters long for every possible file (including the '.png' suffix).

3. Due to the usage of the MD5 hash its unlikely that there occur clashes between two different thumbnails, even if it's theoretically possible. But the probability is very low and can be ignored in this context. The worst case would be that a thumbnail overwrites another valid one. Ok, if they have exactly the same modification time it is theoretically possible too that a wrong thumbnail for a file will be displayed (see Detect Modifications).

4. It's very easy to implement.

There do exist a lot of different library implementations for the MD5 hash algorithm. If you don't want to add yet another library dependency to support thumbnailing in your program you can eg. use the RFC 1321 implementation by L. Peter Deutsch. It adds only 1.5kb sourcecode in two files to your project and can be used without much restrictions.

Detect Modifications

One important thing is to assure that the thumbnail image displays the same information than the original, only in a downscaled version. To make this possible we use the modification time stored in the required 'Thumb::MTime' key and check if it's equal the current modification time of the original. If not we must recreate the thumbnail.

if (file.mtime != thumb.MTime) {
      recreate_thumbnail ();
}
         

It is not sufficient to do a file.mtime > thumb.MTime check. If the user moves another file over the original, where the mtime changes but is in fact lower than the thumbnail stored mtime, we won't recognize this modification.

If for some reason the thumbnail doesn't have the 'Thumb::MTime' key (although it's required) it should be recreated in any case.

There are certain circumstances where a program can't or don't want to update a thumbnail (eg. within a history view of your recently edited files). This is legally but it should be indicated to the user that an thumbnail is maybe outdated or not even checked for modifications.

Thumbnail Creation Failures

Due to several reasons its possible that the generation of a thumbnail fails:

• The file format is unknown and cannot be loaded by the program.

• The file format is known but the file is somehow broken and thus cannot be read.

• The generation of a thumbnail would take too long, due to the large size of the file.

Under some circumstances a program want to preserve the information that the creation failed. Eg to avoid trying it again and again in the future. The problem is that the above mentioned issues are often program specific. Eg Nautilus can't read the native Gimp format xcf but of course Gimp can and could create thumbnails for them. Or one program uses a broken TIFF implementation which refuses to load an TIFF image but another one uses a correct implementation.

Because of this, its best to save these failure information per program. In the Directory Structure section there is already a 'fail' directory mentioned, which should be used for this. Every program must create a directory of it's own there with the name of the program appended by the version number (eg. $XDG_CACHE_HOME/thumbnails/fail/nautilus-1.0).

For every thumbnail generation failure of a readable image, the program creates an empty PNG file. If it's possible to obtain some additional information from the image (see Store Additional Information) they should be stored together with the thumbnail too, at least the required 'Thumb::MTime' and 'Thumb::URI' keys must be set. The procedure for the saving of such a fail image is the same as described in Thumbnail Saving. You must only use the application specific directory within $XDG_CACHE_HOME/thumbnails/fail instead of the size specific ones.

This approach has the advantage that a program can access information about a thumbnail creation failure the same way as it does with successfully generated ones.

Deleting Thumbnails

The deletion of a thumbnail is somehow tricky. A general rule is that a thumbnail should be deleted if the original file doesn't exist anymore (Note: If it was only modified the thumbnail should be recreated instead). There are different ways how this can be achieved:

1. If a file manager is aware of this standard and deletes a file it could take care of deleting the thumbnail too.

2. A daemon runs in the background which cleans up the cache in certain intervals.

3. The user can call a managing tool which lists all the thumbnails together with their original file paths. From there they can delete single images, all images where the original doesn't exist anymore or all images older than eg. 30 days.

Another problem is that there are some URI schemes where it isn't directly possible to determine if the file exists or not. Eg. this applies to all the internet related schemes like http:, ftp: and so on when you don't have an internet connection. The same applies to removable media eg. a cdrom.

The above mentioned managing tools should therefore consider the following rules:

1. If the URI scheme specifies a local file (like the file: scheme) then it should check if the original file exists. If it doesn't exist anymore the program should delete the thumbnail.

2. For all internet related schemes (like http: or ftp:) delete the thumbnail if it hasn't been accessed within a certain user defined time period (can default to 30 days).

3. Removable media should be considered too. Although this can't work for all systems in all cases reliable there are some heuristics which can be used. Eg. checking the fstab configuration file and look for the mount point of /dev/fd0 (floppy disk) or check if the CD-Rom drive is mounted under /cdrom. Thumbnails for removable media files should be handled as in the previous point.

Shared Thumbnail repositories

In some situations it is desirable to have a shared thumbnail repository. This is a read-only collection of thumbnails that is shared among different users or different computers. For example a CD-ROM with images, could include the thumbnails for these images such that they do not need to be generated for every user or computer accessing this CD-ROM.

Because the URI of such an image is not constant (a CD-ROM for example can be mounted at different locations) the thumbnails should be in a relative path from the original image.

The location for shared thumbnails will be

.sh_thumbnails/

Within this directory are the same subdirectories as in the global thumbnail directory.

.sh_thumbnails/
   .sh_thumbnails/normal/
   .sh_thumbnails/large/
   .sh_thumbnails/x-large/
   .sh_thumbnails/xx-large/
   .sh_thumbnails/fail/
   

The meaning of these directories is identical to their meaning in the global directory.

The filename of the thumbnail is also in the shared thumbnail repository the md5sum of the URI. But, because the URI is possibly not constant, only the filename part of the URI should be used, no directory parts.

Conclusion

The proposed way of dealing with file previews fulfiles the requirements of a file type independent preview cache. It is relative easy to use, understand and implement. All these are important facts to allow it's wide spread.

The next step will be to take these ideas to the applications. If a lot of users, coders and maintainers will cooperate on this, we can reach a new level of usability.

Thanks

The following people helped me to write this paper with a lot of suggestions, good ideas and constructive critism. They found serious bugs and problems in previous versions or helped me in another way. Thank you very much:

Darin Adler (Gnome/Nautilus), Alexander Larsson (Gnome/Nautilus), Thomas Leonard (Rox Desktop), Sven Neumann (Gimp), Havoc Pennington (Gnome/freedesktop.org), Malte Starostik (KDE), Owen Taylor (GTK), and all I forgot to mention here.

Links

• URI standard: http://community.roxen.com/developers/idocs/rfc/rfc2396.html

• PNG standard: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-png

• MD5 hash algorithm: http://community.roxen.com/developers/idocs/rfc/rfc1321.html